<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A cautionary tale about maintaining data at home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/</link>
	<description>Phantastic thoughts from Phanfare, the best online photo and video sharing service in the universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Car purchase</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-68526</link>
		<dc:creator>Car purchase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-68526</guid>
		<description>Hi all , Anyone know the words and author of a cautionary tale that starts with the lines:?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all , Anyone know the words and author of a cautionary tale that starts with the lines:?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev homes</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-68101</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev homes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-68101</guid>
		<description>I think it is a nice post with related more information topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a nice post with related more information topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keep Your Computer Running Longer, Sronger And Faster. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-61347</link>
		<dc:creator>Keep Your Computer Running Longer, Sronger And Faster. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-61347</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2006 JRG Computers, <a href="http://www.yourpcguide.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yourpcguide.com</a>. All rights reserved.      Sites you may be interested in Phanfare Blog: Andrew Erlichson » A cautionary tale about maintaining data at home   Tags computer pc computer performance pc speed speed up    This product is also listed in  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Erlichson</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-58128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Erlichson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-58128</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all your suggestions. I have tried Mozy and found it was not reliable enough for me. I dont really want a backup system, I want services to replace my home servers. So Jungle disk is a more attractive solution to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all your suggestions. I have tried Mozy and found it was not reliable enough for me. I dont really want a backup system, I want services to replace my home servers. So Jungle disk is a more attractive solution to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-58109</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-58109</guid>
		<description>Rather than Mozy or Carbonite I went with a 1tb Time Capsule and a 1tb drive (I got it from Other World Computing) that holds a SuperDuper sparseimage of my drive.  I keep the drive at my office and the TC at home.  I figure between two different technologies and drives I should be safe.  Plus I can avoid any potential privacy invasions with an online service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than Mozy or Carbonite I went with a 1tb Time Capsule and a 1tb drive (I got it from Other World Computing) that holds a SuperDuper sparseimage of my drive.  I keep the drive at my office and the TC at home.  I figure between two different technologies and drives I should be safe.  Plus I can avoid any potential privacy invasions with an online service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57830</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57830</guid>
		<description>Add my vote for Mozy.  I never even know it is running until I need some revised file from months ago.  Great system, however recovery of an entire computer is not a drag/drop operation.

I&#039;m experimenting now with a new system called Drop Box, which synchronizes data between multiple computers and stores the information, with all revisions, on Amazon S3 servers.  No pricing has been issued yet, however I have a few 2gb beta test licenses available is anyone needs one.  It reminds me of Phanfare on my two Macs, with easy sync  of my photos.

The new Mobile Me system has peaked my interest and we&#039;ll see what the Apple folks have planned later this week.

Andrew, thank you for the 2.0 changes and continuing to upgrade Phanfare.  I consider it a &quot;must have&quot; on all of my computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add my vote for Mozy.  I never even know it is running until I need some revised file from months ago.  Great system, however recovery of an entire computer is not a drag/drop operation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m experimenting now with a new system called Drop Box, which synchronizes data between multiple computers and stores the information, with all revisions, on Amazon S3 servers.  No pricing has been issued yet, however I have a few 2gb beta test licenses available is anyone needs one.  It reminds me of Phanfare on my two Macs, with easy sync  of my photos.</p>
<p>The new Mobile Me system has peaked my interest and we&#8217;ll see what the Apple folks have planned later this week.</p>
<p>Andrew, thank you for the 2.0 changes and continuing to upgrade Phanfare.  I consider it a &#8220;must have&#8221; on all of my computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57782</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57782</guid>
		<description>If disaster recovery is your goal, I would suggest Mozy. The price is $4.95 a month (I believe) for unlimited storage. The upload pipe is small, so many GB may take days or even a week to upload, but then after that it is just the differential.

Carbonite also does a decent job, but there are two things I like better about Mozy. 1) Mozy supports external hard drives and Carbonite does not (as of this writing). 2) Mozy works better for restoring individual files or directories, to my mind. 

Oh yeah - important since you have a Mac - Mozy has a Mac client. Important since you said you are running a Mac. (I have a Mac and a PC and Mozy works on both my rigs.)

Bear in mind, neither Mozy nor Carbonite are meant to online storage in the sense that you have easy access to your files online nor are they meant for online sharing. They really are meant more for backup/restore.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If disaster recovery is your goal, I would suggest Mozy. The price is $4.95 a month (I believe) for unlimited storage. The upload pipe is small, so many GB may take days or even a week to upload, but then after that it is just the differential.</p>
<p>Carbonite also does a decent job, but there are two things I like better about Mozy. 1) Mozy supports external hard drives and Carbonite does not (as of this writing). 2) Mozy works better for restoring individual files or directories, to my mind. </p>
<p>Oh yeah &#8211; important since you have a Mac &#8211; Mozy has a Mac client. Important since you said you are running a Mac. (I have a Mac and a PC and Mozy works on both my rigs.)</p>
<p>Bear in mind, neither Mozy nor Carbonite are meant to online storage in the sense that you have easy access to your files online nor are they meant for online sharing. They really are meant more for backup/restore.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57754</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57754</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Spinrite from GRC.com?  Its well worth the $90, I had it save several hard disks that appeared dead.  I use Mozy as a backup and also an external USB.  I keep multiple computer synced with foldermatch (free).  I&#039;ve also tried Sugarsync which will store all you items in the &quot;cloud&quot; and then sync to all your PC&#039;s.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Spinrite from GRC.com?  Its well worth the $90, I had it save several hard disks that appeared dead.  I use Mozy as a backup and also an external USB.  I keep multiple computer synced with foldermatch (free).  I&#8217;ve also tried Sugarsync which will store all you items in the &#8220;cloud&#8221; and then sync to all your PC&#8217;s.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57616</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57616</guid>
		<description>Backing up at home is such a simple thing to do, but most people are too lazy or not disciplined enough.  I would succumb to the laziness in a heartbeat if Amazon were cheap enough, but it&#039;s not.  My MP3 collection, photos and data are a little over 200GB.  That would cost $30/month on S3 plus the initial bandwidth hit (and time) to get it there.  I can buy a drive to back all of that up.  I sync it once at home and then keep it at work synced over the line with Mesh.  Amazon has a fantastic service, but I don&#039;t need to be paying for three or more copies of my files in their datacenter when it is merely a backup for me.  The added plus is that I have local speed access of all of my file at home or work and I pay no monthly fee that I&#039;m not already paying (ISP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backing up at home is such a simple thing to do, but most people are too lazy or not disciplined enough.  I would succumb to the laziness in a heartbeat if Amazon were cheap enough, but it&#8217;s not.  My MP3 collection, photos and data are a little over 200GB.  That would cost $30/month on S3 plus the initial bandwidth hit (and time) to get it there.  I can buy a drive to back all of that up.  I sync it once at home and then keep it at work synced over the line with Mesh.  Amazon has a fantastic service, but I don&#8217;t need to be paying for three or more copies of my files in their datacenter when it is merely a backup for me.  The added plus is that I have local speed access of all of my file at home or work and I pay no monthly fee that I&#8217;m not already paying (ISP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57503</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57503</guid>
		<description>Ew... sorry to hear that, Andrew. Bummer.

I gave JungleDisk a try. I haven&#039;t used it since they released that new software update, though. My only real impression (aside from that the software was a little confusing at first... which is supposed to be remedied) is that backing up my files took a LONG time. I mean... I expected it, but it was still frustrating.

I think the key to cloud computing is the illusion of locality. I remember you writing about how the beauty of the Phanfare desktop clients was the way that the photos and videos &quot;feel&quot; local even though they are stored on your servers. I agree that&#039;s a great part and it&#039;s so nice not to have to worry about whether or not I have a file on my computer or not. I recently even gave the integrated Picnik editing a try and was really impressed. It was a snap. I clicked &quot;edit in picnik&quot;, the photo showed up there and when I was done editing, it took me back to Phanfare and I could see the edited file there.

I think one limitation, however, is that there are still quite a few things which cannot be done to the file after it has already been uploaded to Phanfare. For example, I can&#039;t change the filename. If I wanted to do something as simple as change the filename I have to download the file, change it on my desktop, and re-upload it. That seems like a rather inefficient use of bandwidth. Another example is if I wanted to add IPTC metadata to a file. Again, I would need to download in, change it and re-upload it. In both this case and the case of re-naming the file, only a few bytes or kilobytes are being changed, but the whole file has to be downloaded and uploaded.

My point is that I&#039;d like to upload once and only once. As it is, I&#039;m realizing that if I want my image descriptions to travel with the file wherever they go (as in if I ever left Phanfare... or if I simply wanted to share a file on another photo-sharing site), I&#039;d have to add the description to the IPTC data before uploading. What if Phanfare could simply write that metadata into my file for me whenever I add a description to a photo within Phanfare? What if I had the ability to rename my meaningless image filenames to something significant like its date from within Phanfare? Sorry for harping on this theme!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ew&#8230; sorry to hear that, Andrew. Bummer.</p>
<p>I gave JungleDisk a try. I haven&#8217;t used it since they released that new software update, though. My only real impression (aside from that the software was a little confusing at first&#8230; which is supposed to be remedied) is that backing up my files took a LONG time. I mean&#8230; I expected it, but it was still frustrating.</p>
<p>I think the key to cloud computing is the illusion of locality. I remember you writing about how the beauty of the Phanfare desktop clients was the way that the photos and videos &#8220;feel&#8221; local even though they are stored on your servers. I agree that&#8217;s a great part and it&#8217;s so nice not to have to worry about whether or not I have a file on my computer or not. I recently even gave the integrated Picnik editing a try and was really impressed. It was a snap. I clicked &#8220;edit in picnik&#8221;, the photo showed up there and when I was done editing, it took me back to Phanfare and I could see the edited file there.</p>
<p>I think one limitation, however, is that there are still quite a few things which cannot be done to the file after it has already been uploaded to Phanfare. For example, I can&#8217;t change the filename. If I wanted to do something as simple as change the filename I have to download the file, change it on my desktop, and re-upload it. That seems like a rather inefficient use of bandwidth. Another example is if I wanted to add IPTC metadata to a file. Again, I would need to download in, change it and re-upload it. In both this case and the case of re-naming the file, only a few bytes or kilobytes are being changed, but the whole file has to be downloaded and uploaded.</p>
<p>My point is that I&#8217;d like to upload once and only once. As it is, I&#8217;m realizing that if I want my image descriptions to travel with the file wherever they go (as in if I ever left Phanfare&#8230; or if I simply wanted to share a file on another photo-sharing site), I&#8217;d have to add the description to the IPTC data before uploading. What if Phanfare could simply write that metadata into my file for me whenever I add a description to a photo within Phanfare? What if I had the ability to rename my meaningless image filenames to something significant like its date from within Phanfare? Sorry for harping on this theme!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://blog.phanfare.com/2008/07/a-cautionary-tale-about-maintaining-data-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-57494</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phanfare.com/?p=78#comment-57494</guid>
		<description>So true: http://www.smugmug.com/price/smugvault.mg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true: <a href="http://www.smugmug.com/price/smugvault.mg" rel="nofollow">http://www.smugmug.com/price/smugvault.mg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

