Comments on: Initial impressions of the Panasonic LX3

By: sanader

sanader — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:00:25 +0000

hah i knew this wud happen, thanx.

By: Back Massager

Back Massager — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:15:15 +0000

kitesurf, LX3 is meant for taking photos, HD video with an average sound quality. If you want yourself a good sound clarity etc. go get yourself a recording device. And ow 1 more thing, So far LX3 is one of the best point and shoot camera out there. It has a Leica lens on it, nuff said.

By: welly

welly — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:03:09 +0000

Panasonic LX3 is not a regular item, I want it long but so far can not yet, hopefully in the near future I can get it

By: family ski resort

family ski resort — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:43:44 +0000

I've been hearing nothing but good news about it since its release. Finally, something worthy to replace my old yet reliable Canon 40D.

By: FrancisWakeboardingEquipments

FrancisWakeboardingEquipments — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:03:53 +0000

Many people recommends LX3 than it's nearest competitor the CanonG10. I planning to buy this one, It has good reviews and setting similar to dslr's but it much more compact and light to carry.

By: lake tahoe ski resort

lake tahoe ski resort — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:04:35 +0000

Thank you so much for this concise review. Lately I've been thinking on what camera would be best for skiing and at the same time user-friendly. This camera is now one of those on top of my list. =)

By: kitesurf

kitesurf — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:38:11 +0000

There is so much to say, one thing that I didn't like the most was the sound clarity!

By: erlichson

erlichson — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:46:03 +0000

can you tell me more?

By: kitesurf

kitesurf — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:57:05 +0000

I have used Lx3 for five months and found it very irritating.

By: erlichson

erlichson — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:52:30 +0000

my experience is similar to yours; iso 400 the highest place you want to be. but, i find that having an f2.0 lens helps me use lower iso speeds and hence the camera is more versatile in low light situations. i think it is the lens and manual controls, not the sensor, that is the story with this camera.

By: jefferson graham

jefferson graham — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:22:34 +0000

I was carrying the LX3 around with me at CES–I was shocked by how poor the image quality was at high ISO levels. I did some natural light pictures at a party, at 1600 ISO and could see some human beings there under the dots. Better at 800, much better at 400, and decent in great light. But if that's the case, why get a camera with a 2.0 lens if it can't perform in low light?

By: shantanu sarkar

shantanu sarkar — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:48:17 +0000

wow it’s really cool.For more log onto http://www.uploaded.tv