Comments on: Facebook explodes, chases company 1/100th its size

By: Slingshot RPM

Slingshot RPM — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:38:28 +0000

FAcebook and Twitter is very different, I prefer Facebook because it caters photos and videos. If your a photographer you can showcase you shoots in there, unlike Twitter.

By: Slingshot RPM

Slingshot RPM — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:38:28 +0000

FAcebook and Twitter is very different, I prefer Facebook because it caters photos and videos. If your a photographer you can showcase you shoots in there, unlike Twitter.

By: christopherhsshanes

christopherhsshanes — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:29:00 +0000

Customer services really sucks in almost all traditional touch-tone based IVR systems. Using a well designed Speech interface to customer service functions should help alleviate http://www.chase.com these problems an render Paul’s site useless. Delta, Amtrak, ABN Amro, Office Depot and Bank of America are good examples of this – although Bank of America remains on the list as they roll out their speech interface network-wide.

By: jerryclatham28

jerryclatham28 — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:02:06 +0000

Capital One expects cumulative losses on Chevy Chase’s $11.8 billion loan portfolio to be $1.75 billion, according to a person familiar with the situation. Chevy Chase has $4.15 billion in adjustable-rate mortgages known as option ARMs that have come under particular strain www.chase.com during the housing meltdown. The bank’s profits fell 69% in the third quarter, to $5.9 million.A company that made its name as a marketer of no-fee credit cards, Capital One became a regional bank in 2005 and 2006 through acquisitions of Hibernia Corp. and North Fork Bancorp. It now has 739 branches. Chevy Chase will give the company a combined 983 branches.

By: Kurt Sanders

Kurt Sanders — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:29:40 +0000

I agree with you, Twitter caught a HUGE break on the news because of simplicity and the catchy name. Kids love to say less and using the SMS upload to a wide audience appeals to them as well as politicians (who in my mind are still teenagers). To see the news anchors also Twitter is just insane, they are a mindless set of talkers desiring a public.

Facebook is more robust and has the security controls I desire in a social networking system. Having FAcebook blink and chase Twitter was a bad idea and looks like Twitter envy. My family and friends are not pleased with the changes in Facebook and I predict that they will follow Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL which I used if they don't watch out for their loyal customers. Twitter will not be where I go, but I detect a small opening for a new web company to emerge.

By: erlichson

erlichson — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:42:24 +0000

google had no business model early on (well, they thought it was going to be selling search appliances to companies), just consumer adoption. youtube was in a similar situation. seems unlikely to me that facebook can't parlay the amount of user attention they have into a profitable business.I dont see a lot of proxies for companies that have the the level of adoption that facebook has that did not find a model, provided their costs were not crazy. twitter has a very small team (under 50). they will do fine.

By: TS Low

TS Low — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:31:28 +0000

Reality is that facebook makes no money and has not been able to figure out how to do so. Advertising revenues are not what they once were (and are unlikely to rise much in the future), and the company is chewing up capital at an extraordinary, unsustainable rate.

So for facebook, this is about momentum and justification. Both facebook and twitter are nuts because they have free models. Don't follow the tech; follow the money.

Didn't we learn anything during the dotcom bust?

By: Microdermabrasion

Microdermabrasion — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:45:38 +0000

You got excellent writing skills. Awesome article. I enjoyed every word of it. Thanks:)

By: erlichson

erlichson — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:34:31 +0000

you make a good point. i think twitter will evolve much like blogging. most blogs have very few readers, and most twitterers will have a handful of followers. in the world of blogging, there are personal blogs, but few of them have any significant number of readers. the big blogs cover topics interesting to a larger, if still niche-focused, audience. Twitter will evolve the same way. A long tail of personal twitterers and small minority of twitterers who serve the mass majority. Either way, I think twitter looks much more like a blogging phenom then what drives facebook, which is about staying in touch personally with people you know and like.

By: DaveMc

DaveMc — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:45:15 +0000

Andrew, my first thought as well. The wall message is more like an @reply, though, in that if Person A writes on Person B's wall, that message appears in my feed if and only if I'm friends with both Person A and Person B, exactly like in Twitter. On the other hand, I don't think twitter has an exact counterpart to the Facebook 'comment', as there is no way I can send anything that can be seen by all of your twitter followers.

Also, I'm not quite sure there is a standard twitter user, yet. My sister's husband has about 1000 followers in a loose social group around Windows programming. More serious/work-related than facebook, but not impersonal.